Friday, February 3, 2017

New Cultural Climate Leading to Change in Student Involvement Education

Summary: With the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States the emphasis for the correct approach to allow college students to express their opinion has become even more vital. Faculty at Washington State University believe the combination of student involvement on campus, along with being provided the right tools to have a constructive dialogue, are key to discussing how to live in our current culture.

PULLMAN -- The election of Donald Trump as president has brought a change in culture to Washington State University leading to adaptations in both teaching methods and student involvement on campus to create an open dialogue. 

During fall 2016 students involved with the College Republicans club on campus erected a wall to symbolize the representation of Trump’s proposed boarder wall between the United States and Mexico. The night following Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, James Allsup, the president of WSU’s College Republicans reported he had beenassaulted by an anti-Trump demonstrator.

With students on both sides of the argument Sarah Whitey, an instructor in WSU’s Department of Sociology, said the way students are taught to respond the culture change impacts how successful the discussion can be.

“What I found in my class is students are reluctant to talk about it because they are under the impression that we speak at each other and not to each other,” Whitley said in response to discussing political topics. “If it’s relating to politics they don’t think we’ll be able to find a middle ground so when I’ve been bringing particular issues up in class they are actually averse to talking about it.”

Whitley teaches Introduction to Sociology, Development of Social Theory, and Sociology of Education and has previously taught urban sociology and gender related sociology classes. In addition to her work as an instructor Whitley also serves as an advisor to the sociology club.

Different from the lack of involvement in a classroom setting Whitley has noticed an increase in students seeking ways to get involved on campus and having a constructive discussion on harder subjects like politics.

“If we walk to talk to other folks that have other perspectives from ourselves, how do we do that productively so that we can have a conversation with each other and not be talking at each other,” Whitley added, posing the question of how to approach tough conversations. “I think it’s encouraging that students are recognizing they need skills to be able to do that and as a group we can talk about what the best way is that we can move forward and talk about theses issues and be constructive.”

The assault on Allsup as serves as a reminder that students should feel safe in their right to share their beliefs without fear of retaliation.

Matthew Sionson, a member of the sociology club at WSU who also participates in two other clubs on campus, said having the understanding that others will have a different view has helped him better approach tough conversations with other students.

I’m not afraid to cover topics those view as sensitive in modern society,” Sionson said. “I’m aware that individuals maintain different viewpoints in society and that I should respect the opinions of others.

“Being an Asian male I have dealt with racism in the past. However, that does not make me insecure in my opinions or what I believe in. If I view something as morally wrong in politics, I am not afraid to speak out. By being involved in clubs it has actually made me more confident in myself and how I am able to communicate through expressing political opinions and fighting for what I believe in.

While Sionson has benefitted from his involvement on campus, and more specifically with the sociology club, but others still aren’t yet able to feel comfortable voicing their opinion.

Beth Hindman, Chair of the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication and Sociology department, said having individuals return to the thought of having a mutual understanding when discussing topics that have the potential to turn violent if not brought up appropriately.

In some ways we have to rely on the social contract we have with each other, to offer at least a minimal level of respect for others’ rights to speak, even when we vehemently disagree,” Hindman said. “Actively de-escalating situations, speaking calmly and rationally, acknowledging that others have a point of view…those are all ways we can attempt to conduct political conversations. And when the ‘other’ side isn’t doing those things, sometimes the best strategy is to walk away.”

Sources:

Matthew Sionson: (360) 969-4416

Beth Hindman: (509) 335-8758; ehindman@wsu.edu

Sarah Whitley: (509) 335-2659); Whitley@wsu.edu 

Outline

1. Headline
2. Summary
3. Lede with background
4. Additional background on topic
5. Introduce Sarah Whitley (first source)
6. Whitley quote
7. Club involvement with Whitley
8. Second Whitley quote
9. Introduce Matthew Sionson (second source)
10. Sionson quote 
11. Introduce Beth Hindman (third source)
12. Hindman quote 

No comments:

Post a Comment